<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quick Tip: How to Get Other Websites Linking to Yours</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vervefactor.com/blog/2008/05/08/quick-tip-how-to-get-other-websites-linking-to-yours/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vervefactor.com/blog/2008/05/08/quick-tip-how-to-get-other-websites-linking-to-yours/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 14:55:48 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.vervefactor.com/blog/2008/05/08/quick-tip-how-to-get-other-websites-linking-to-yours/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://championassistants.wordpress.com/?p=59#comment-16</guid>
		<description>This is a great list, thanks. I would advise a word of caution regarding #5, though: Really research the free or even paid sites you want to use for repurposing. We signed up w/ a free site a while back and later found some of our article content used improperly -- by *our* standards but, unfortunately, not by the standards of the repurposing site (a fine print oversight).

So check review sites for the site you are thinking of using and look for any negatives. One negative we encountered w/ said site was their very strict publishing guidelines, which interpreted business case study articles that were more academic in nature as mere, fluffy PR pieces.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great list, thanks. I would advise a word of caution regarding #5, though: Really research the free or even paid sites you want to use for repurposing. We signed up w/ a free site a while back and later found some of our article content used improperly &#8212; by *our* standards but, unfortunately, not by the standards of the repurposing site (a fine print oversight).</p>
<p>So check review sites for the site you are thinking of using and look for any negatives. One negative we encountered w/ said site was their very strict publishing guidelines, which interpreted business case study articles that were more academic in nature as mere, fluffy PR pieces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

